HYCM UK Swings to £236,304 Loss in 2025 as Costs Outpace Revenue Growth
HYCM Capital Markets (UK) Limited reported a £236,304 loss for 2025, as higher administrative costs offset a small rise in revenue and reversed the previous year’s profit.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:SVS Securities' special administration is ending, with all client funds and custody assets returned except for 8 clients. The cost of restoring assets is to be covered by clients, with a £44.5m cost cushion established. FSCS reimbursement covered most costs. There were not enough realizations to pay a dividend to insolvent or preferred debtors. No further action is necessary for clients.

The ultimate achievement report for the SVS Securities Special Administrators, which spans the time period from 5 February to 30 March 2023, has been released. The study attests to the fact that the company's special management is coming to an end and that it is transitioning to closure. SVS Securities' FCA license has been requested to be canceled by the Administrators.
Except for a very small number of outliers (8 Clients), the Administrators have verified that all of the Clients' Custody Assets and Client Money rights have been refunded in compliance with the Regulations. The bulk of Clients had their Custody Assets and Client Money transferred to ITI on the Transfer Date in line with the Regulations.
The law regulating the special administration system stipulates that the expenses associated with restoring custody assets must be covered by those assets. The law stipulates that the expenses of sending client money must be subtracted in a way that results in a uniform reduction in the amount of client money that each customer is entitled to. This implies that the Company's clients are eventually responsible for paying the costs associated with restoring Custody Assets and/or Client Money.
An early cost cushion had to be established in conjunction with the Distribution Plan for the expenses of the Company's Special Administration, which are deducted from Custody Assets and Client Money. Using a conservatively projected expenditure of £44.5 million, the cost cushion was determined. This number was anticipated to be susceptible to discounts and refunds as greater clarity about the final level of expenses was reached, as originally recommended to Clients. The expenses were also up for evaluation by an impartial charge evaluator chose by the Creditors' Committee.

A total of £30.24 million has been spent on the Special Administration's expenses, of which $29.09 million will go toward the cost of restoring client funds and custody assets. Each Client's portion of the expenses related to returning Custody Assets and Client Money has been limited to 10% of any Client Money and £5,578.80 for Custody Assets (down from £10,626.50 as of the Effective Date). Clients' shares of the expenses have been limited to the value of the Custody Assets as of the Effective Date in cases where they possessed Custody Assets worth less than £5,578.80 as of that date.
Since the overwhelming majority of the Company's clients are qualified for FSCS reimbursement, the costs of restoring Custody Assets and Client Money have actually been covered by the FSCS, despite the fact that those costs are nominally the responsibility of the Company's clients. With the exception of six corporate clients, one individual client, and six corporate clients who are not eligible for FSCS compensation as well as one individual client whose losses exceed the FSCS compensation limit of £85,000 per claimant, this has made it possible to return to Clients their entire entitlement to Custody Assets and Client Money.
After subtracting expenses related to the company's house estate, there were not enough realizations on the house assets to allow a payout to be issued to insolvent or preferred debtors.
Clients of SVS Securities are not required to take any further action. There is no longer a designated contact facility for queries. After the Special Administration ends, the designated email query handle will no longer be active for three months. The Administrators will not be able to reply to any more information queries from Clients once they have left their positions.
Install the WikiFX App on your smartphone to stay updated on the latest news.
Download the App: https://social1.onelink.me/QgET/px2b7i8n

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

HYCM Capital Markets (UK) Limited reported a £236,304 loss for 2025, as higher administrative costs offset a small rise in revenue and reversed the previous year’s profit.

XELLION, a Saint Lucia-based forex broker, is reportedly facing many complaints from users. Among the complaints, the lack of smooth fund withdrawals remains the most disturbing one. This issue was not only highlighted by real users but also the Introducing Broker (IB) who expressed shock over this issue on broker review platforms. In this XELLION review article, we have examined these allegations against the brokerage entity.

If you're looking for information about AssetsFX deposit and AssetsFX withdrawal processes, you're taking a smart step when choosing a broker. However, when it comes to AssetsFX, we need to discuss some serious concerns right away. While its website shows many modern payment options that look good, many user reports tell a very different and worrying story, especially about people not being able to get their funds back. Keep reading!

When traders look at a new broker, the most important question is always about safety. This is especially true for AssetsFX, a broker whose online presence raises a serious question: Is AssetsFX safe or a scam? The answer isn't immediately obvious, as the broker has a very divided reputation. When you search for user feedback, you find two completely different stories. On the one hand, there are many positive reviews. On the other side, there are very serious claims of financial wrongdoing. This article won't waste your time. Our goal is to look through all the information, from regulatory status to real user AssetsFX complaints, to help you understand the major risks and make a smart decision about your investments.